The issue of K. Much suggests that it is mocking. The assistants assigned to him are childish and troublesome, very likely dispatched as spies. The messages he receives are so ambiguous in language, so ill-informed regarding his activities, that he despairs after receiving them, despite the fact that he wants nothing more than to be acknowledged. Alas, K. His superior, Klamm, is perceived by K. Under no conditions! Stalemated, K.
By means of subplots, mainly involving the family of K. Like Joseph K. Frieda peace , the mistress of Klamm, represents domestic pleasure, the highest Earth has to offer. Although she agrees to leave Klamm for K. Forsaking the sensual and domestic comforts, K. After losing her, K. I should at once begin to neglect her all over again.
This is how it is. In addition to Frieda, K. Like K. Her family has worn itself out, as K. From K. In ruling, they are attentive to trivial detail but bureaucratically indifferent to human considerations. Though Kafka did not complete The Castle , his intended ending was communicated to Brod.
Around K. With remarkable prescience, Kafka had sketched his own epitaph. Consider the treatment accorded his memory: Czech authorities placed signs in five languages to mark his grave, yet for more than twenty years they forbade sale of his works.
Bibliography Anderson, Mark, ed. New York: Schocken Books, Bloom, Harold, ed. Franz Kafka. New York: Chelsea House, Gray, Richard T. Gross, Rolf J. Goebel, and Clayton Koelb. A Franz Kafka Encyclopedia. Westport, Conn. Gray, Ronald. NewYork: Cambridge University Press, Hayman, Ronald. K: A Biography of Kafka. New ed. London: Phoenix, Karl, Frederick.
Pawel, Ernst. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, Preese, Julian, ed. Cambridge Companion to Kafka. New York: Cambridge University Press, Robertson, Ritchie.
Kafka: Judaism, Politics, and Literature. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, You must be logged in to post a comment. Like this: Like Loading Leave a Reply Cancel reply You must be logged in to post a comment.
In order to protect his theory, he confessed and admitted to ordinariness. Finally, the caring, good side of Raskolnikov defeats his evil side, as he turns to a life of Christianity with Sonia.
Throughout his trial, Josef K. Not being able to understand the kind of legal system he was dealing with, k. He then dies on his 31st birthday. This novel illustrates the senses of religion as it becomes one of the forces that influence the outcome of Josef K.
Josef K. Shots were fired, and a triple murder was committed. Two people were at the scene, Patty Valentine and a man, but there were no witnesses. The number one contender for the heavyweight title is not even near the shootings.
Introduction In the story The Trial by Franz Kafka, Joseph K is the main character of the story who is arrested for no apparent reason. The story tells the process of his trial for a crime that he is unaware of committing. His feeling of importance soon diminishes as he succumbs to the process of the trial, even though he questions the validity of his arrest throughout the story.
There are two clear struggles that are presented throughout this story: a power struggle between Joseph K and the authorities, as well as a social class struggle. Open Document. Essay Sample Check Writing Quality.
Maryam M. Elhabashy Mrs. Published in , The Trial is classified as both absurdist and psychological fiction. The Trial is a parable written in third person limited omniscient depicting the trials of a man trying to establish his innocence for a crime he did not commit. The entire book revolves around one main character, Josef K.
The story begins with his arrest. He is outraged and defiant towards everything the officers and inspector tell him.
For the next year, Josef K. The court is stolid and indifferent towards K. Freud himself often pointed out that the analysis of artistic values is not within the scope of the analytical methods he taught.
There is the sociological interpretation, according to which Kafka's work is but a mirror of the historical-sociological situation in which he lived. For the critic arguing this way, the question is not what Kafka really says but the reasons why he supposedly said it. What the sociological and the psychological interpretations have in common is the false assumption that the discovery of the social or psychological sources of the artist's experience invalidate the meaning expressed by his art.
Within the sociological type of interpretation, one of the most popular methods of criticism judges Kafka's art by whether or not it has contributed anything toward the progress of society. Following the Marxist-Leninist dictum that art must function as a tool toward the realization of the classless society, this kind of interpretation is prevalent not merely in Communist countries, but also among the New Left critics this side of the Iron and Bamboo Curtains.
Marxist criticism of Kafka has shifted back and forth between outright condemnation of Kafka's failing to draw the consequences of his own victimization by the bourgeoisie and between acclamations stressing the pro-proletarian fighting quality of his heroes. That Kafka was the propagator of the working class as the revolutionary class has been maintained not only by official Communist criticism, but also by Western "progressives. Yet in a conversation with his friend Janouch, he spoke highly of the Russian Revolution, and he expressed his fear that its religious overtones might lead to a type of modern crusade with a terrifying toll of lives.
Surely a writer of Kafka's caliber can describe the terror of a slowly emerging totalitarian regime Nazi Germany without being a precursor of communism, as Communist criticism as often claimed. One can also read The Trial as the story of K. But one must not neglect or ignore the fact that Kafka was, above all, a poet; and to be a poet means to give artistic expression to the many levels and nuances of our kaleidoscopic human condition. To see Kafka as a social or political revolutionary because his country doctor, for instance, or the land surveyor of The Castle seeks to change his fate through voluntary involvement rather than outside pressure is tantamount to distorting Kafka's universal quality in order to fit him into an ideological framework.
Closely connected with the quasi-religious quality of Marxist interpretations of Kafka's stories are the countless philosophical and religious attempts at deciphering the make-up of his world. They range from sophisticated theological argumentation all the way to pure speculation. Although Kafka's religious nature is a subject complex and controversial enough to warrant separate mention, the critics arguing along these lines are also incapable, as are their sociological and psychological colleagues, of considering Kafka simply as an artist.
What they all have in common is the belief that Kafka's "real meaning" lies beyond his parables and symbols, and can therefore be better expressed in ways he himself avoided for one reason or another. The presumptuousness of this particular approach lies in the belief that the artist depends on the philosopher for a translation of his ambiguous modes of expression into logical, abstract terms. All this is not to dispute Kafka's philosophical-religious cast of mind and his preoccupation with the ultimate questions of human existence.
It is just that he lived, thought, and wrote in images and not in "coded" conceptual structures. Kafka himself thought of his stories merely as points of crystallization of his problems: Bendemann, Samsa, Gracchus, the hunger artist, the country doctor, Josef K.
Interpretations are always a touchy matter and, in Kafka's case, perhaps more so than in others.
0コメント