Federal government after school programs

Note that there may be some differences in each state for these programs, so you may want to confirm the requirements for the related department or agency. Meanwhile, the FinanceProject. If your organization is working to create or maintain after-school program that is related to children and youth with disadvantages and your organization works in the Baltimore City, you should contact the Annie E. Applicants should contact the foundation by calling You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Grants for After School Programs. Government Grants After School Programs. Related Posts. Tags: after school program grants from the government , federal grants for after school programs , funding for after school music programs , government grants , government grants for after school programs , government grants for after school tutoring programs , grant funding for afterschool programs , grant money for after school programs , grants for after school art programs , Grants for After School Programs , grants for after school programs in chicago , Grants for After School Programs in Illinois , grants for before and after school programs , transportation grants for after school programs.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply You must be logged in to post a comment. In , the Department of Education contracted with Mathematica Policy Research to evaluate the 21 st Century program. The evaluation had elements that were both rigorous and representative. The elementary school part of the study was designed as an experiment; the middle school part was designed as a random sampling of programs around the country, with students participating in the program matched with students in neighboring schools or the same school, in rural areas that were not participating in the program.

The evaluation collected data on a wide range of outcomes including grades, test scores, attendance, and behavior. Ultimately, the evaluation reported on how the program affected outcomes. Except for student behavior, which got worse. And small samples were not an issue explaining why findings were insignificant. The national evaluation included about 2, elementary school students and 4, middle school students.

The results were insignificant because the estimates of program effects hovered around zero. In the face of these results, one course of action would have been to at least reduce program spending, if not eliminate the program altogether. To this day, the program spends more than a billion dollars each year.

If the national evaluation was thought to be unreliable or errant, a sensible next step would be to do another, possibly with different focuses or features. Or perhaps the evaluation findings were dismissed because other research has shown that afterschool programs are effective. Two other pieces of evidence add to this picture. First, the U. The study examined programs that are required to be offered by schools that do not meet target levels of adequate yearly progress under No Child Left Behind.

They are tutoring and academic support service programs offered outside the regular school day that have a stronger academic focus than the 21 st Century programs which can offer snacks, recreation, and youth development activities , and yet they still did not improve academic outcomes.

Other studies reach conclusions that are more positive. Studies need to undertake objective measurements of real outcomes. But additional federal funding remains critical because that allows California to meet the needs of more teenagers, Tran said. Click here to cancel reply. We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy. Will the grants for the afterschool program employees, In Palo Alto continue to pay their employees during the forced shut downs from the coronavirus?

Please clarify??